RedCell Forum
https://redcellgaming.com/forum2/

Photography
https://redcellgaming.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=2488
Page 4 of 5

Author:  Phoenix7015 [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

In the interest of shorter loading times, I'm going to post photos here in the future, so here goes.
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Author:  Deks [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

All of these are really great. Keep up the good work. :D

Author:  Aero [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

Phoenix7015 wrote:
In the interest of shorter loading times, I'm going to post photos here in the future, so here goes.

Image


Image



As usual, they look very cool :)
These two are my favorites of the ones you just posted.

Author:  Minus [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

amazing as usual phoenix! wouldn't expect anything less :)

Author:  ritehandkid [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

Phoenix7015 wrote:
Image


those power lines are killing me :?

Image

Author:  Phoenix7015 [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

Agreed, but I'm not so good at cloning stuff out like that, so my excuse is that I like the contrast they provide ;D

How did you do it? It looks kinda splotchy, but I assume you didn't spend that much time on it.

Author:  ritehandkid [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

Phoenix7015 wrote:
Agreed, but I'm not so good at cloning stuff out like that, so my excuse is that I like the contrast they provide ;D

How did you do it? It looks kinda splotchy, but I assume you didn't spend that much time on it.



I just selected it and used CS5's content aware fill, 5 seconds of work.. didn't feel like touching it up [yawn]

Author:  Phoenix7015 [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

I suspected that might be it, but I'm still using CS4. I can do a decent job with clone tool, but it's quite a pain to make it look good.

Speaking of CS5, any other notable features for photography purposes?

Author:  ritehandkid [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

Phoenix7015 wrote:
I suspected that might be it, but I'm still using CS4. I can do a decent job with clone tool, but it's quite a pain to make it look good.

Speaking of CS5, any other notable features for photography purposes?


yeah there's a bunch I'm loving it...

my favorite of the new features is their upgraded HDR processing, they made it a billion times better and I no longer have to use a third party program to compile my HDR pictures :)

they also upgraded their whole camera raw workspace and the image processing thru it is way better

oo one more thing i like to is their automatic lens correction which fixes distortions n such in a second

there's a bunch of other new features but those are my favorite photography ones.. also puppet warp, that is ridiculous amounts of fun

Author:  Phoenix7015 [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

Four more. And not even any power lines rhk.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Always nice to hear which ones you love/hate/whatever.

Author:  ritehandkid [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

The first pic has some really nice colors, and I like the contrast between the branches in the foreground to the bright background... but that blurry branch in the center kinda kills the picture...

The second is very blurry... :(

The last two could also be great shots but you seem to have a very narrow focus point on your camera and that doesn't really work when taking macro plant pictures, there are some cases when it does work but your subject in the picture takes priority from everything else, esp with the blurred background.


all in all they could be some great shots, but you jsut need to get more comfortable with your camera and work on focal points :)

(just a bit of constructive criticism)

Author:  Phoenix7015 [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

For the first one, agreed with the branch. I prolly shoulda gotten out the chainsaw or something, but wasn't even thinking about it when I shot >.< Also of interest, I had to flip it left/right in PS.

For the second one I was going for a pinhole camera look...

For the last two, I prolly would have used a slightly smaller aperature had it been less dark out, but I think I got the important bits in focus. For some reason, I have never really liked flower shots where everything is sharp.

Author:  ritehandkid [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

Focusing on one part of a flower does look great as well, but I do think yours are still too narrow focused, the top perspective doesnt really play well on the last image, If you went more level with the plant and got more of a profile shot I think it would look very nice... The one above that is just an odd focus area it's kinda sporadic, If it was just focused on the center of the flower and maybe the top peddel it would be more appealing... But It's fucking hard to take macro pictures, esp with a small lcd display on a dslr, when I take macro pictures I usually shoot 5-10 of the same subject adjusting the focus here and there.. but that's just my thoughts, you're doing great work keep it up :)

Image

Image

Image

Author:  Phoenix7015 [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

ritehandkid wrote:
usually shoot 5-10 of the same subject adjusting the focus here and there

Same here, and usually the cool looking things happen to blowing around in the wind, without enough light to get more depth of field :D

I usually like to go with natural light, but maybe I should try flash more. It looks like all three of yours were with flash, right? I like the black background with the second one.
_________________
Image

_________________
Image

Author:  ritehandkid [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Photography

Phoenix7015 wrote:
Same here, and usually the cool looking things happen to blowing around in the wind, without enough light to get more depth of field :D

I usually like to go with natural light, but maybe I should try flash more. It looks like all three of yours were with flash, right? I like the black background with the second one.



I really hate wind :( It ruins my HDR pictures, even the slightest movement and I get ghosting everywhere :?

But yeah it's with a flash to get the black background effect, I didn't really like it at first because it kinda looks like a picture of a flower in a studio with a black backdrop, but idk I've come to like the effect :)

To do it you gotta use very high aperture & flash and make sure nothing in the background is reflective or super close to the subject, or else that ruins it..

Page 4 of 5 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/