Ill skip to the point to debate your contradictions in order to refute anything else. What good is invaluable non consistent information? -.-
Quote:
I'm not really afraid of losing in public. Failure isn't really a big deal, especially in an internet debate. Why am I the one with all the fans all of the sudden? I thought you were the one with all the influence around here
First off, I admire your shamelessness. Providing sarcastic insults is pretty bold when we're both trying to be serious. I must admit, ill try to add my own now and then too. And if losing isnt that big a deal, to be on an equilibrium, winning mustn't be either. So why pick a fight with me? You feel accomplished? You like the somewhat sadistic aspect of being able to pick fights with people in an "internet debate" and provide reckless explanations as to why, how, and when things should be trusted, believed, and picked apart due to prior histories? This isn't even an argument at all. You cant tell me im not a female, that's that. You cant tell others im not, unless you want to be a bully; and an incorrect one, at that. Especially since you don't know. But one of the retarded rules of the internet decrees that
When In Doubt, Its a Dude. Childish and immature, at best. Ill refrain from further adjectives since those get my point across. Plus, after reading further rules, some of them deny the complete existence whatsoever of females on the internet. And one, also, states that there can only be
One Per Internet. First there should be assumptions there are none. Then there are none. Now there's one. Consistent, truly. At least try to stay reliable with your sources. I could just as easily go to a 6-year old with a simple mathematical equation of 2 + 2 = 4. Sure, I trust that since its correct and numbers don't lie. But, I wont go to the same child for Rocket Science. Especially since he/she also believes that they can fly, float, breath underwater, go into space with no protection or transportation, and adequately run from "here" to California "in, like, 20 minutes"; rubbish. Also, if you really want to bring others into this, so be it. However, until they allegedly, too, can bring evidence to the table that I do -not- have a vagina then they are just as irrelevant, mistrusted, incorrect, and ignorant as you right now in this very situational argument. My main point, still, is that taking a mere one rule from a "rubbish" site, itself, the rule, is contradicted by following and previous "rules" is simply retarded. And, you -still- cant tell me im not a female nor anyone else because you don't know. Nor am I going to the limits to do so. Like I said previously, those that need to know know. If you're really that curious though, ask NoKill about the picture I sent him on his request to prove to him that I was a female. If he doesn't understand, tell him "the one with the Sprite". Then, only, can you come back to this and dispute my, seemingly obvious, gender. Having trust and disbelief issues isn't my problem. Go to others about that. Not me. And most certainly, don't bring them out on me. Because, frankly, -I don't care-.