Build a Desktop

ikeahyllan · **Posted:** Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:33 pm

Myst wrote:

ikeahyllan wrote:

w7 is so much better then vista.

Not hard to improve on crap. [giggle]

but you have a hard time to improve yourself, mr.mammas boy [giggle2]

Phoenix7015 · **Joined:** Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:13 pm **Posts:** 293

ikeahyllan · **Posted:** Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:39 am

outdated stuff

Phoenix7015 · **Joined:** Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:13 pm **Posts:** 293

Cheaper stuff.

SphinX · **Posted:** Thu Jun 25, 2009 2:07 am

Virus wrote:

Myst wrote:

ikeahyllan wrote:

w7 is so much better then vista.

Not hard to improve on crap. [giggle]

windows 7 and vista are two different worlds. windows 7 works, windows vista hardly. windows 7 is fuckin damn fast (it took me not even 2 minutes to install cod4), windows vista 64 not (took me about 20-25 minutes). windows 7 is smart, the explorer-handling is much better, the taskbar and tab handling is just awesome. no more problems with a huge icon tray in the taskbar. no more problems with stupid security-alerts and shit and stupid textballons that pop up in vista. No more problems with ''admin''- and useraccount-rights (that was the worst thing of all in vista).

Well if those points do not convince you i wud just recommend u to give it at least a shot. try it 1 hour and u gonna love it. its like xp: stable, nice and good - just faster and smarter.

Ah and yes the i7 is worth it. At least when u do multitask-operations like 3 different graphic programs open at the same time. its damn fast lol. but ye, i think a cheaper one will do it either.

Quote:

Don't get a velociraptor...

ssd !

ikeahyllan · **Posted:** Thu Jun 25, 2009 2:46 am

get a i7 and a ssd hdd thats power

ritehandkid · **Posted:** Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:10 am

Get a Celeron D and a 5400rpm IDE drive. That's true speed.

Myst · **Posted:** Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:37 am

Unless you want to move your PC around while your using it SSD is pointless. More expensive for less memory and it isn't that much faster, well not fast enough for the extra money you have to pay in my opinion.

SSD in laptops, yes. SSD in desktops, no.

Virus · **Posted:** Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:52 am

SphinX wrote:

[

windows 7 and vista are two different worlds. windows 7 works, windows vista hardly. windows 7 is fuckin damn fast (it took me not even 2 minutes to install cod4), windows vista 64 not (took me about 20-25 minutes). windows 7 is smart, the explorer-handling is much better, the taskbar and tab handling is just awesome. no more problems with a huge icon tray in the taskbar. no more problems with stupid security-alerts and shit and stupid textballons that pop up in vista. No more problems with ''admin''- and useraccount-rights (that was the worst thing of all in vista).

Well if those points do not convince you i wud just recommend u to give it at least a shot. try it 1 hour and u gonna love it. its like xp: stable, nice and good - just faster and smarter.

Ah and yes the i7 is worth it. At least when u do multitask-operations like 3 different graphic programs open at the same time. its damn fast lol. but ye, i think a cheaper one will do it either.

Quote:

Don't get a velociraptor...

ssd !

well, Win7 is the same like vista, just like it should be... its like, AudiA5(vista) and AudiS5(Win7), look pretty the same, but WTF WHERE COMES THIS POWER FROM !!!!!!!!!

and SSD in laptops, what for a crap are you talking myst, these thingys are friggin fast, doesnt matter laptop or Desktop

i clearly forgot about this thread... kimbo, decide, i7 or not, then i could start... btw, i have the WD Caviar Black 1TB, its pretty nice :P

btw, prototype uses 4 cores :>

SphinX · **Posted:** Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:52 am

Myst wrote:

Unless you want to move your PC around while your using it SSD is pointless. More expensive for less memory and it isn't that much faster, well not fast enough for the extra money you have to pay in my opinion.

SSD in laptops, yes. SSD in desktops, no.

embarrasing example of absolutley no knowledge.
watch this myst: www.youtube.com/watch?v=96dWOEa4Djs

Virus · **Posted:** Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:08 am

SphinX wrote:

Myst wrote:

Unless you want to move your PC around while your using it SSD is pointless. More expensive for less memory and it isn't that much faster, well not fast enough for the extra money you have to pay in my opinion.

SSD in laptops, yes. SSD in desktops, no.

embarrasing example of absolutley no knowledge.
watch this myst: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96dWOEa4Djs

just made a test with my WD 1TB 7.200RPM HDD:

average read of about 85 m/s, ssd has 2GB/s ...

Samsung SPC 250GB 7.200RPM:

WD Elements External 500GB (USB) :

BTW:

its only the reading speed, writing speed is much lower...

with the newest generation of SSD Chips, you have 2GB Read and 2GB Write!

Myst · **Posted:** Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:10 am

SphinX wrote:

embarrasing example of absolutley no knowledge.
watch this myst: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96dWOEa4Djs

I have seen this, i pretty sure i showed it to you, and i'm just saying that if you had loads of regular hard drives it would be just as fast, you just couldn't jump up and down on a trampoline.

Virus · **Posted:** Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:19 am

read my edit, you hardwarefail
and i showed him the video :P

Phoenix7015 · **Joined:** Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:13 pm **Posts:** 293

Read this: http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdo ... i=3531&p=1

Bottom line: SSDs don't have much better sequential read/write speeds, but they kill hard disks in terms of random read/write. This is what really matters.

Virus · **Posted:** Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:11 am

im too lazy to search it in my hardwaremagazines and im pretty sure no one of you can read german, new SSD chips are much faster than normal Magnet Disc-Hard Disc Drives... and they have constantly write/read, new Samsung have 200mb/s Write and Read, my WD 7.200 has 35mb/s Write and 85mb/s read

Build a Desktop

Who is online